Editorial & Technical Inquiries
HTTPLens is maintained by protocol engineers and web performance specialists. If you have identified an inaccuracy, an ambiguous RFC citation, or an unhandled edge case in our diagnostic tools, please reach out directly:
Direct Email
For editorial queries, peer review proposals, or security disclosures:
GitHub Repository & Issues
For reproducible code errors, diagnostic tool bugs, or documentation errata:
Reporting Protocol Errata
Protocol accuracy is our highest priority. When submitting a correction, please include:
- The exact page URL where the issue appears (e.g.
/http-errors/429-too-many-requests/). - The authoritative normative source (e.g. RFC 9110 Section 10.2.3, WHATWG Fetch §3.2, or IANA Registry).
- A minimal reproducible test case (cURL request, browser DevTools screenshot, or server response log) if applicable.
Response Time Commitment
Our editorial review board triages errata submissions within 2 business days. Confirmed specification inaccuracies are updated, redeployed, and recorded with an updated revision date.
Institutional Links
To learn more about our verification methodology and governance: